How data centers can better manage energy use
A new study suggests flexibility in the timing of electricity consumption could lower consumer costs.
Faculty
Christopher Knittel is the Associate Dean for Climate and Sustainability, the George P. Shultz Professor and a Professor of Applied Economics at the MIT Sloan School of Management.
Prior to MIT Sloan, Knittel taught at the University of California, Davis, and at Boston University. His research focuses on industrial organization, environmental economics, and applied econometrics.
Knittel is an associate editor of The American Economic Journal— Economic Policy, The Journal of Industrial Economics, and the Journal of Energy Markets. His research has appeared in The American Economic Review, The Review of Economics and Statistics, The Journal of Industrial Economics, The Energy Journal, and other academic journals. He also is a Research Associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research in the Productivity, Industrial Organization, and Energy and Environmental Economics groups.
Knittel holds a BA in economics and political science from California State University, Stanislaus; an MA in economics from the University of California, Davis; and a PhD in economics from the University of California, Berkeley.
Clausing, Kimberly A., Christopher R. Knittel, and Catherine Wolfram. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. Forthcoming.
Senga, Juan Ramon L., Audun Botterud, John E. Parsons, S. Drew Story, and Christopher R. Knittel. Nature Energy Vol. 11, No. 2 (2026): 240-243. Download Preprint.
Senga, Juan Ramon L., Shen Wang, and Christopher R. Knittel. iScience (2026).
Espiritu Argosino, Fischer J. and Christopher R. Knittel, Working Paper. December 2025.
Knittel, Christopher R., and Samuel Stolper. The Economic Journal Vol. 135, No. 672 (2025): 2377-2401. NBER Working Paper.
Knittel, Christopher R., Gilbert E. Metcalf, and Shereein Saraf, MIT Sloan Working Paper 7349-25. Cambridge, MA: MIT Sloan School of Management, June 2025. NBER Working Paper No. 33894.
A new study suggests flexibility in the timing of electricity consumption could lower consumer costs.
From insurance premiums to energy bills, a new study from MIT Sloan shows how Americans are already paying the price of climate change, and climate inaction, driven by extreme weather.
In a research brief, associate dean Christopher Knittel and co-author wrote: "Using a two-way fixed-effects regression model that controls for unobserved differences between years and between states, we found that renewable energy portfolio standards have virtually no impact on prices, and large-scale renewables are moderately associated with lower prices; in particular, large-scale solar is strongly linked to lower prices."
Associate dean Christopher Knittel and co-author wrote: "A simple accounting check shows why our estimated magnitude isn't a stretch. In Massachusetts, fixed costs make up roughly 60 percent of total system costs, and about 13 percent of customers have rooftop solar and pay very little, if anything, toward those costs because net metering zeroes out their bills. When this happens, the fixed cost of running the grid doesn't shrink; it just gets divided over a base that's 13 percent smaller."
A paper by associate dean Christopher Knittel and co-authors argued that the administration's calculations contained major inconsistencies, such as in its assumptions about how consumers value the benefits of saving fuel. "If you do the analysis right, we found that revoking these standards does not save consumers money," said Knittel.
In Houston gas cost nearly $1.10 more on August 31 than it did on the day before the war began, according to data from GasBuddy. A one-dollar increase in prices equates to $60 more a month for the average household, said associate dean Christopher Knittel. Rural drivers pump more gas, driving more miles in less fuel-efficient vehicles, according to Knittel.