Confronting disinformation spreaders on Twitter only makes it worse, MIT scientists say
"In a recent paper published in Nature, we found that a simple accuracy nudge...improved the quality of the news [people] shared afterward."
"In a recent paper published in Nature, we found that a simple accuracy nudge...improved the quality of the news [people] shared afterward."
"People fall for fake news when they rely on their intuitions and emotions, and therefore don't think enough about what they are reading."
"...the point is that the platforms are, by design, constantly distracting people from accuracy.”
Speed, distraction and emotions can obscure a person's ability to sniff out misinformation on social media.
When a user shares something...It seems that he’s mostly trying to impress his followers and entertain them.
“...vaccination endorsements from elite Republicans...can have an important impact on the vaccination intentions of everyday Republicans.”
"There's no one thing that solves the problem of false news online … But we're working to add promising approaches to the ... tool kit.”
“It's not necessarily that users don't care about accuracy. But instead, it's that the social media context just distracts them … "
"You are even more influenced by fact-checks on false claims that are aligned with your politics compared to ones that aren't."
"Since 2016, [social media] platforms have been under a huge amount of public pressure to act on misinformation."