What is the jagged AI frontier?
A working definition from MIT Sloan
jagged AI frontier (noun)
The nonintuitive strengths and weaknesses of AI performance relative to human performance, and how it is changing over time.
A study about the impact of AI on the productivity of highly skilled workers sheds new light on the possibilities and pitfalls of relying too much on technology and not enough on human intuition.
A team of researchers that included MIT Sloan’s Kate Kellogg found that when generative AI is used within the boundary of its capabilities, it can improve a worker’s performance by as much as 40% compared with workers who don’t use it. But when generative AI is used outside that boundary in an attempt to complete a task, worker performance drops by an average of 19 percentage points.
Navigating this jagged technological frontier takes skill and training. Because some AI-generated answers look credible even when they’re incorrect, developers could work on designing an interface that would help workers avoid falling into such traps. Kellogg also recommended that organizations have an onboarding phase so employees can get a sense of how and where AI works well and where it doesn’t, and receive performance feedback. And everyone should be embracing a culture of accountability. “Managers and workers need to collectively develop new expectations and work practices to ensure that any work done in collaboration with generative AI meets the values, goals, and standards of their key stakeholders,” Kellogg said.
How generative AI can boost highly skilled workers’ productivity
Working Definitions: Artificial Intelligence
MIT Sloan's Working Definitions explore the words and phrases behind emerging management ideas.
Leading the AI-Driven Organization
In person at MIT Sloan
Register Now
Data liquidity leads to AI success
Three levers — data architecture, data preparation, and data permissions — determine whether data becomes a reusable strategic asset or stays trapped in silos.
Pro-worker AI, explained
Artificial intelligence can make workers more capable and productive, but only if leaders design and deploy it to augment human judgment.
5 things to consider when working with AI
Researchers at the MIT Initiative on the Digital Economy share the latest insights about getting the most from working with AI, such as personality pairing and reorganizing job tasks.
Balance AI innovation and risk with ‘minimum viable governance’
As organizations scale generative AI, traditional governance models prove to be too rigid or too loose. Minimum viable governance calibrates oversight to risk, enabling responsible innovation.
The surprising power of warmth in AI negotiations
In MIT’s international AI Negotiation Competition, “warmer” agents achieved better outcomes in negotiations with other AI agents.
Seeing real value from AI depends on being able to verify its outputs
A new paper explores how seeing economic value from artificial intelligence hinges on closing the gap between what AI can do and how humans can verify its outputs.
‘AI gravity’ is pulling you toward dependency. Here’s how to push back
AI systems hold the promise of competitive advantage, but they can usher in cognitive decline among workers, says MIT Sloan School of Management’s Eric So. Learn how to protect cognitive capital.
Heeding the pope’s call to ensure AI protects human dignity
Following Pope Leo XIV’s encyclical on AI, MIT Sloan professor emeritus Thomas A. Kochan argues that firms should partner with workers to ensure AI augments human skills and knowledge.
What senior leaders want to know about AI
Leaders are turning to MIT Sloan Executive Education to learn more about AI, including managing humans amid technological change and rethinking their relationships with IT departments.
What leaders still get wrong about AI
Organizations are struggling to succeed with AI. Research from the MIT Center for Information Systems Research shows common mistakes and how to overcome them.