What is techno-optimism?
A working definition from MIT Sloan
techno-optimism (noun)
The notion that technological change will automatically lead to better outcomes for society, especially for workers via the labor market.
Amid anxiety about artificial intelligence, automation, and job loss, some people point to history and say that technological change will eventually benefit everyone, despite some bumps along the way.
MIT economists and Nobel laureates Daron Acemoglu and Simon Johnson argue that this techno-optimism overlooks the role that economic and political decisions play alongside technological development.
“Our understanding of the relevant economic theory and history has led us to believe [techno-optimism] isn’t right,” Acemoglu told MIT Sloan Management Review in 2023. “Throughout history, deliberate decisions have had a bearing on who gained and lost from a particular technology, whether it brought anything approaching shared prosperity, or even whether it helped or destroyed democracy.”
In their 2023 book, “Power and Progress: Our 1,000-Year Struggle Over Technology and Prosperity,” the pair examine the Industrial Revolution as an example of technological change that began with bad outcomes — child laborers pushing coal carts, for example. This was because the revolution was driven by an entrepreneurial class focused on productivity and allowed to operate nearly unchecked in 19th-century Britain, where democracy was conditional and unions were illegal.
Gains for workers came eventually but required “a complete change in the institutional fabric of British society,” Johnson said.
Working Definitions: Future of Work
MIT Sloan's Working Definitions explore the words and phrases behind emerging management ideas.
Future-Ready Enterprise Academy
In person at MIT Sloan
Register here
Pro-worker AI, explained
Artificial intelligence can make workers more capable and productive, but only if leaders design and deploy it to augment human judgment.
5 things to consider when working with AI
Researchers at the MIT Initiative on the Digital Economy share the latest insights about getting the most from working with AI, such as personality pairing and reorganizing job tasks.
‘AI gravity’ is pulling you toward dependency. Here’s how to push back
AI systems hold the promise of competitive advantage, but they can usher in cognitive decline among workers, says MIT Sloan School of Management’s Eric So. Learn how to protect cognitive capital.
Heeding the pope’s call to ensure AI protects human dignity
Following Pope Leo XIV’s encyclical on AI, MIT Sloan professor emeritus Thomas A. Kochan argues that firms should partner with workers to ensure AI augments human skills and knowledge.
How AI is reshaping workflows and redefining jobs
New research shows that AI delivers the most value when organizations redesign workflows, not just when they automate individual tasks.
Putting AI to work: The latest from MIT Sloan Management Review
New MIT Sloan Management Review insights cover types of AI startups, using agentic AI tools for knowledge work, and why AI isn't boosting productivity.
3 ways to use AI: Are you a cyborg, a centaur, or a self-automator?
A study of consultants found that employees use generative AI three different ways. Each has different implications for on-the-job learning.
Generative AI changes how employees spend their time
Software developers with access to a generative AI tool do more coding and less project management, according to a new study.
What 2 MIT experts are thinking about AI and work
David Autor and Neil Thompson on the importance of using AI tools to collaborate with humans and the nuances of how AI affects productivity and replaces workers.
Future manufacturing: How to solve the US productivity paradox
U.S. manufacturing productivity remains flat despite an uptick in new factory and workforce growth in recent years. MIT experts suggest three solutions.