What is the jagged AI frontier?
A working definition from MIT Sloan
jagged AI frontier (noun)
The nonintuitive strengths and weaknesses of AI performance relative to human performance, and how it is changing over time.
A study about the impact of AI on the productivity of highly skilled workers sheds new light on the possibilities and pitfalls of relying too much on technology and not enough on human intuition.
A team of researchers that included MIT Sloan’s Kate Kellogg found that when generative AI is used within the boundary of its capabilities, it can improve a worker’s performance by as much as 40% compared with workers who don’t use it. But when generative AI is used outside that boundary in an attempt to complete a task, worker performance drops by an average of 19 percentage points.
Navigating this jagged technological frontier takes skill and training. Because some AI-generated answers look credible even when they’re incorrect, developers could work on designing an interface that would help workers avoid falling into such traps. Kellogg also recommended that organizations have an onboarding phase so employees can get a sense of how and where AI works well and where it doesn’t, and receive performance feedback. And everyone should be embracing a culture of accountability. “Managers and workers need to collectively develop new expectations and work practices to ensure that any work done in collaboration with generative AI meets the values, goals, and standards of their key stakeholders,” Kellogg said.
How generative AI can boost highly skilled workers’ productivity
Working Definitions: Artificial Intelligence
MIT Sloan's Working Definitions explore the words and phrases behind emerging management ideas.
Leading the AI-Driven Organization
In person at MIT Sloan
Register Now
How to accelerate AI transformation
A new MIT Sloan executive education course looks at how organizations need to align “the work, the workforce, and the workplace” to succeed with artificial intelligence.
Putting AI to work: The latest from MIT Sloan Management Review
New MIT Sloan Management Review insights cover types of AI startups, using agentic AI tools for knowledge work, and why AI isn't boosting productivity.
The AI developments finance pros should be tracking
A new MIT Sloan executive education course led by professor Andrew W. Lo explores machine reasoning, quantamental investing, AI governance, and more.
The Fed, AI, and economic uncertainty: What investors need to know
MIT Sloan’s Gary Gensler and Peter R. Fisher advise investors to develop an AI investment thesis and avoid overconfident investing during policy pivots.
3 ways to use AI: Are you a cyborg, a centaur, or a self-automator?
A study of consultants found that employees use generative AI three different ways. Each has different implications for on-the-job learning.
How algorithmic data deserts exclude consumers
As AI systems shape more decisions, some individuals and businesses are left out entirely. New research highlights how data gaps create hidden risks for organizations.
Where to look for generative AI risks
New research can help business leaders identify and address AI components that introduce risk, such as training data, foundation models, and user prompts.
Generative AI changes how employees spend their time
Software developers with access to a generative AI tool do more coding and less project management, according to a new study.
Use this AI tool to ask better questions, get more authentic results
The new Question Burst Catalyst tool from MIT Sloan’s Hal Gregersen helps leaders use LLMs as a creative thought partner to help surface ideas that truly matter.
Action items for AI decision makers in 2026
AI industry watchers Thomas Davenport and Randy Bean expect the AI hype cycle to slow as organizations focus on infrastructure and strategy.