What is a meritocracy paradox?
A working definition from MIT Sloan
meritocracy paradox (noun)
A situation in which organizational efforts to reward effort and ensure equal opportunity for all may, ironically, deepen inequities and unfairness.
Organizations tout meritocracy as a fair and efficient way to identify, advance, and reward talent. But their efforts to guarantee that everyone has an equal chance to compete and succeed are often held back by talent management systems that confer rewards based on individual performance evaluations.
In practice, such merit-based systems “may actually reinforce or create advantages for certain groups because of underlying biases and existing social barriers,” writes Emilio J. Castilla, professor at MIT Sloan and the author of “The Meritocracy Paradox: Where Talent Management Strategies Go Wrong and How to Fix Them.”
In one company field study, Castilla found that women, racially disadvantaged populations, and immigrants “earned a lower merit-based bonus than white men despite working in the same jobs and work units, having the same supervisors, holding the same human capital, and, notably, obtaining the same performance score.” Among the potential drivers of that inequity: unrecognized workplace biases, inconsistent definitions of merit, and a lack of vigilance among managers who believe their company is already meritocratic.
To address these hidden biases and inefficiencies, Castilla encourages organizations to embrace a data-driven approach to meritocracy. This entails:
- Identifying, developing, and defining competency criteria
- Measuring individual attributes and employment outcomes over time
- Analyzing data collected on both outcomes and people-related processes
- Choosing an intervention and
- Monitoring the results regularly.
Why talent management strategies go wrong — and how to fix them
Human Resources
Future-Ready Enterprise Academy
In person at MIT Sloan
Register here
AI hiring perpetuates familiar biases. Here’s how to avoid that trap
The AI hiring revolution doesn’t have to be a story of automated bias, argues MIT Sloan’s Emilio J. Castilla. Tough questions and constant monitoring can lead to fairer systems.
Why talent management strategies go wrong — and how to fix them
“The Meritocracy Paradox” offers frameworks to help organizations make people-management decisions based on data and evidence rather than intuition.
The business benefits of a workplace health and well-being committee
HaWCs can be a cost-effective way to reduce turnover among front-line employees and save your organization money.
How to lead tech professionals and teams
Keeping your technology workforce operating at peak performance is critical to digital business success. Here’s how to motivate and manage tech workers.
How to build a winning team, on or off the court
Here’s how to align talent, culture, and strategy to create lasting team success, according to private equity exec and WNBA franchise CEO Suzanne Abair.
The most serious cases reported by organizational ombuds
When employees contact an ombuds, what issues are raised — and which are most important to all stakeholders, including the organization?
Finance taps generative AI to streamline accounting, hiring tasks
In finance, AI can improve efficiency and help executives make strategic decisions, but proper governance is a must.
FMLA may be weak, but it does help women advance in the workforce
Researchers studied the effects the Family and Medical Leave Act had after its passage in 1993. Here’s where it drove change.
6 ways businesses can leverage generative AI
Experts from Salesforce, S&P Global, and Corning share six key strategies to unlock generative AI’s potential without falling for the hype.
New research debunks 4 myths about ‘impostor syndrome’
Impostor thoughts reflect the belief that others overestimate your abilities. New research shows they’re not all bad and don’t last forever.