What is machine usefulness?
A working definition from MIT Sloan
machine usefulness (noun)
The idea that artificial intelligence should primarily enhance human capabilities rather than replace them.
Current efforts to develop powerful artificial intelligence are mostly based around “machine intelligence” — the idea that machines can think like humans and even outperform them. According to MIT economists and Nobel laureates Daron Acemoglu and Simon Johnson, this framing, combined with a focus on maximizing shareholder wealth, could tip the balance of power toward management, disrupting the workforce and creating greater inequity.
Acemoglu and Johnson argue for a more human-focused version of AI. Shifting the focus from “machine intelligence” to “machine usefulness” would elevate the idea that computers should primarily enhance human capabilities. This would be “a much more fruitful direction for increasing productivity,” Acemoglu and Johnson wrote in a 2023 opinion piece in The New York Times. “By empowering workers and reinforcing human decision making in the production process, it also would strengthen social forces that can stand up to big tech companies.”
Steps toward reframing the relationship between humans and artificial intelligence include asserting individual ownership rights over the data used to build AI systems, pushing back against surveillance capitalism, and establishing a graduated system for corporate taxes, the authors write.
Working Definitions: Artificial Intelligence
MIT Sloan's Working Definitions explore the words and phrases behind emerging management ideas.
AI Executive Academy
In person at MIT Sloan
Register Now
Data liquidity leads to AI success
Three levers — data architecture, data preparation, and data permissions — determine whether data becomes a reusable strategic asset or stays trapped in silos.
Pro-worker AI, explained
Artificial intelligence can make workers more capable and productive, but only if leaders design and deploy it to augment human judgment.
5 things to consider when working with AI
Researchers at the MIT Initiative on the Digital Economy share the latest insights about getting the most from working with AI, such as personality pairing and reorganizing job tasks.
Balance AI innovation and risk with ‘minimum viable governance’
As organizations scale generative AI, traditional governance models prove to be too rigid or too loose. Minimum viable governance calibrates oversight to risk, enabling responsible innovation.
The surprising power of warmth in AI negotiations
In MIT’s international AI Negotiation Competition, “warmer” agents achieved better outcomes in negotiations with other AI agents.
Seeing real value from AI depends on being able to verify its outputs
A new paper explores how seeing economic value from artificial intelligence hinges on closing the gap between what AI can do and how humans can verify its outputs.
‘AI gravity’ is pulling you toward dependency. Here’s how to push back
AI systems hold the promise of competitive advantage, but they can usher in cognitive decline among workers, says MIT Sloan School of Management’s Eric So. Learn how to protect cognitive capital.
Heeding the pope’s call to ensure AI protects human dignity
Following Pope Leo XIV’s encyclical on AI, MIT Sloan professor emeritus Thomas A. Kochan argues that firms should partner with workers to ensure AI augments human skills and knowledge.
What senior leaders want to know about AI
Leaders are turning to MIT Sloan Executive Education to learn more about AI, including managing humans amid technological change and rethinking their relationships with IT departments.
What leaders still get wrong about AI
Organizations are struggling to succeed with AI. Research from the MIT Center for Information Systems Research shows common mistakes and how to overcome them.