What is pro-worker AI?
A working definition from MIT Sloan
pro-worker AI (noun)
Generative artificial intelligence that complements humans and augments their skills.
Artificial intelligence will have a substantial impact on the future of work. So far, automation efforts seem likely to displace skilled workers and diminish worker voice, according to MIT professors Daron Acemoglu, David Autor, and Simon Johnson.
In a 2023 policy memo, the three professors — who lead the MIT Shaping the Future of Work Initiative — argued that the nature of AI’s impact on work and inequality is not inevitable; it depends on how society develops and shapes the technology. Used correctly, generative AI could create and support new occupational tasks and new capabilities for workers, especially for people without a four-year college degree.
“If AI tools can enable teachers, nurse practitioners, nurses, medical technicians, electricians, plumbers, and other modern craft workers to do more expert work, this can reduce inequality, raise productivity, and boost pay by leveling workers up,” they wrote.
The memo suggested policy changes, including updating Occupational Safety and Health Administration rules to limit worker surveillance, increasing funding for research on human-complementary technology, and equalizing the tax rates for employing workers and owning equipment and algorithms.
Working Definitions: Artificial Intelligence
MIT Sloan's Working Definitions explore the words and phrases behind emerging management ideas.
Leading the AI-Driven Organization
In person at MIT Sloan
Register Now
Data liquidity leads to AI success
Three levers — data architecture, data preparation, and data permissions — determine whether data becomes a reusable strategic asset or stays trapped in silos.
Pro-worker AI, explained
Artificial intelligence can make workers more capable and productive, but only if leaders design and deploy it to augment human judgment.
5 things to consider when working with AI
Researchers at the MIT Initiative on the Digital Economy share the latest insights about getting the most from working with AI, such as personality pairing and reorganizing job tasks.
Balance AI innovation and risk with ‘minimum viable governance’
As organizations scale generative AI, traditional governance models prove to be too rigid or too loose. Minimum viable governance calibrates oversight to risk, enabling responsible innovation.
The surprising power of warmth in AI negotiations
In MIT’s international AI Negotiation Competition, “warmer” agents achieved better outcomes in negotiations with other AI agents.
Seeing real value from AI depends on being able to verify its outputs
A new paper explores how seeing economic value from artificial intelligence hinges on closing the gap between what AI can do and how humans can verify its outputs.
‘AI gravity’ is pulling you toward dependency. Here’s how to push back
AI systems hold the promise of competitive advantage, but they can usher in cognitive decline among workers, says MIT Sloan School of Management’s Eric So. Learn how to protect cognitive capital.
Heeding the pope’s call to ensure AI protects human dignity
Following Pope Leo XIV’s encyclical on AI, MIT Sloan professor emeritus Thomas A. Kochan argues that firms should partner with workers to ensure AI augments human skills and knowledge.
What senior leaders want to know about AI
Leaders are turning to MIT Sloan Executive Education to learn more about AI, including managing humans amid technological change and rethinking their relationships with IT departments.
What leaders still get wrong about AI
Organizations are struggling to succeed with AI. Research from the MIT Center for Information Systems Research shows common mistakes and how to overcome them.