What is algorithmic aversion?
A working definition from MIT Sloan
algorithmic aversion (noun)
The conscious or unconscious reluctance of human decision-makers to accept algorithmic recommendations.
Algorithms can help us make better decisions. But to follow their advice, humans must trust them. The way humans view algorithmic recommendations varies based on what they know about how the artificial intelligence model works and how it was created, according to research co-authored by MIT Sloan professor Kate Kellogg. Prior research assumed people are more likely to trust interpretable AI models, in which they can see how the models make their recommendations. But Kellogg found that this isn’t always true.
In an experiment at Tapestry, a New York-based house of lifestyle brands, product allocators were charged with maximizing sales. That involved placing the right number of items in the right stores at the right time. Product allocators received recommendations from either an interpretable algorithm or an uninterpretable machine learning algorithm.
Overall, the human allocators experienced less algorithmic aversion with the uninterpretable model than with the one they could more easily understand. Why? The researchers found that being able to troubleshoot the interpretable algorithm by reviewing its inner workings led allocators to sometimes overrule the recommendations. Meanwhile, knowing peers had developed and tested the uninterpretable algorithm made them more likely to accept its recommendations.
Why employees are more likely to second-guess interpretable algorithms
Working Definitions: Artificial Intelligence
MIT Sloan's Working Definitions explore the words and phrases behind emerging management ideas.
Leading the AI-Driven Organization
In person at MIT Sloan
Register Now
5 investments to close the gap between AI wealth and welfare
Transformative technologies like artificial intelligence succeed when societies make parallel social investments to ensure gains are distributed equitably, MIT Sloan researchers find.
Meet the new faculty members joining MIT Sloan in 2026
Debiased machine learning, the currency of invoicing, and training good models with bad data: Meet the new experts bringing their knowledge and skill sets to the MIT Sloan School of Management.
Data liquidity leads to AI success
Three levers — data architecture, data preparation, and data permissions — determine whether data becomes a reusable strategic asset or stays trapped in silos.
Pro-worker AI, explained
Artificial intelligence can make workers more capable and productive, but only if leaders design and deploy it to augment human judgment.
5 things to consider when working with AI
Researchers at the MIT Initiative on the Digital Economy share the latest insights about getting the most from working with AI, such as personality pairing and reorganizing job tasks.
Balance AI innovation and risk with ‘minimum viable governance’
As organizations scale generative AI, traditional governance models prove to be too rigid or too loose. Minimum viable governance calibrates oversight to risk, enabling responsible innovation.
The surprising power of warmth in AI negotiations
In MIT’s international AI Negotiation Competition, “warmer” agents achieved better outcomes in negotiations with other AI agents.
Seeing real value from AI depends on being able to verify its outputs
A new paper explores how seeing economic value from artificial intelligence hinges on closing the gap between what AI can do and how humans can verify its outputs.
‘AI gravity’ is pulling you toward dependency. Here’s how to push back
AI systems hold the promise of competitive advantage, but they can usher in cognitive decline among workers, says MIT Sloan School of Management’s Eric So. Learn how to protect cognitive capital.
Heeding the pope’s call to ensure AI protects human dignity
Following Pope Leo XIV’s encyclical on AI, MIT Sloan professor emeritus Thomas A. Kochan argues that firms should partner with workers to ensure AI augments human skills and knowledge.