What is algorithmic aversion?
A working definition from MIT Sloan
algorithmic aversion (noun)
The conscious or unconscious reluctance of human decision-makers to accept algorithmic recommendations.
Algorithms can help us make better decisions. But to follow their advice, humans must trust them. The way humans view algorithmic recommendations varies based on what they know about how the artificial intelligence model works and how it was created, according to research co-authored by MIT Sloan professor Kate Kellogg. Prior research assumed people are more likely to trust interpretable AI models, in which they can see how the models make their recommendations. But Kellogg found that this isn’t always true.
In an experiment at Tapestry, a New York-based house of lifestyle brands, product allocators were charged with maximizing sales. That involved placing the right number of items in the right stores at the right time. Product allocators received recommendations from either an interpretable algorithm or an uninterpretable machine learning algorithm.
Overall, the human allocators experienced less algorithmic aversion with the uninterpretable model than with the one they could more easily understand. Why? The researchers found that being able to troubleshoot the interpretable algorithm by reviewing its inner workings led allocators to sometimes overrule the recommendations. Meanwhile, knowing peers had developed and tested the uninterpretable algorithm made them more likely to accept its recommendations.
Why employees are more likely to second-guess interpretable algorithms
Working Definitions: Artificial Intelligence
MIT Sloan's Working Definitions explore the words and phrases behind emerging management ideas.
Leading the AI-Driven Organization
In person at MIT Sloan
Register Now
6 questions to guide your AI strategy
Few AI pilots scale successfully. Asking key questions about goals, governance, and culture can help them thrive.
Why AI-driven enterprises are the future of entrepreneurship
AIDEs have lower overhead, are extremely efficient at product development, require a smaller footprint, and provide increased ownership for founders, according to MIT Sloan’s Paul Cheek.
How organizations can capture value from digital colleagues
As AI systems become more capable, companies will need to think beyond individual tools and begin managing AI as a digital colleague — part of how teams, workflows, and business processes operate.
AI financial advice can be good — especially with the right questions
Large language models encourage smart financial behavior, but they fall short on the more subtle aspects of saving and investing, according to MIT Sloan’s Taha Choukhmane and co-authors.
These are the most urgent AI risks, according to 272 experts
Which AI risks could cause the most harm in the next five years? New MIT research shows that businesses should be aware of threats like competitive pressure and dangerous AI capabilities.
5 ways to make agentic AI a competitive advantage
Enterprises looking to make the most of agentic AI will have to rethink how work gets done and how teams are organized, without forgetting the human workers who set their companies apart.
Who will own the AI agent economy?
Here’s what businesses need to know as AI agents move from centralized systems toward a decentralized network of trillions of personal and organizational agents.
5 investments to close the gap between AI wealth and welfare
Transformative technologies like artificial intelligence succeed when societies make parallel social investments to ensure gains are distributed equitably, MIT Sloan researchers find.
Meet the new faculty members joining MIT Sloan in 2026
Debiased machine learning, the currency of invoicing, and training good models with bad data: Meet the new experts bringing their knowledge and skill sets to the MIT Sloan School of Management.
Data liquidity leads to AI success
Three levers — data architecture, data preparation, and data permissions — determine whether data becomes a reusable strategic asset or stays trapped in silos.